{"id":3613,"date":"2019-04-03T12:00:07","date_gmt":"2019-04-03T11:00:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/?p=3613"},"modified":"2019-04-03T12:10:04","modified_gmt":"2019-04-03T11:10:04","slug":"ts-segregacion-municipal-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/ts-segregacion-municipal-2\/","title":{"rendered":"TS &#8211; Segregaci\u00f3n municipal"},"content":{"rendered":"[vc_row type=&#8221;in_container&#8221; full_screen_row_position=&#8221;middle&#8221; scene_position=&#8221;center&#8221; text_color=&#8221;dark&#8221; text_align=&#8221;left&#8221; overlay_strength=&#8221;0.3&#8243; shape_divider_position=&#8221;bottom&#8221;][vc_column column_padding=&#8221;no-extra-padding&#8221; column_padding_position=&#8221;all&#8221; background_color_opacity=&#8221;1&#8243; background_hover_color_opacity=&#8221;1&#8243; column_shadow=&#8221;none&#8221; column_border_radius=&#8221;none&#8221; width=&#8221;1\/1&#8243; tablet_text_alignment=&#8221;default&#8221; phone_text_alignment=&#8221;default&#8221; column_border_width=&#8221;none&#8221; column_border_style=&#8221;solid&#8221;][vc_column_text]\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>STS 217\/2019.\u00a0<\/strong>Se confirma la improcedencia de que el barrio de Igueldo se segregue del municipio de San Sebasti\u00e1n.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row type=&#8221;in_container&#8221; full_screen_row_position=&#8221;middle&#8221; scene_position=&#8221;center&#8221; text_color=&#8221;dark&#8221; text_align=&#8221;left&#8221; overlay_strength=&#8221;0.3&#8243; shape_divider_position=&#8221;bottom&#8221;][vc_column column_padding=&#8221;no-extra-padding&#8221; column_padding_position=&#8221;all&#8221; background_color_opacity=&#8221;1&#8243; background_hover_color_opacity=&#8221;1&#8243; column_shadow=&#8221;none&#8221; column_border_radius=&#8221;none&#8221; width=&#8221;1\/1&#8243; tablet_text_alignment=&#8221;default&#8221; phone_text_alignment=&#8221;default&#8221; column_border_width=&#8221;none&#8221; column_border_style=&#8221;solid&#8221;][vc_column_text]\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>STS 217\/2019, de 21 de febrero.\u00a0<\/strong>La Comisi\u00f3n Promotora para el reconocimiento de Igueldo como municipio \u201cItxas-Aurre\u201d recurre en casaci\u00f3n la sentencia del Tribunal Superior de Justicia del Pa\u00eds Vasco que estim\u00f3, a su vez, el recurso contencioso-administrativo interpuesto por el Ayuntamiento de San Sebasti\u00e1n frente al Decreto Foral 46\/2013 de la Diputaci\u00f3n de Guip\u00fazcoa. Este Decreto revocaba uno anterior, el 6\/2010, que desestim\u00f3 la segregaci\u00f3n del barrio de Igueldo del municipio de San Sebasti\u00e1n.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Son varios los argumentos de la sentencia recurrida para anular el Decreto Foral 46\/2013. As\u00ed, \u00e9ste no puede tener valor revocatorio de un decreto adoptado en otro procedimiento administrativo distinto. Tampoco respeta el requisito de la Norma Foral 2\/03, que establece un m\u00ednimo de 2.500 habitantes de Derecho para la creaci\u00f3n de nuevos municipios. Incluso si se prescinde de este requisito, <em>la sola voluntad popular no es determinante para la segregaci\u00f3n territorial<\/em>que se pretende. Y, por \u00faltimo, tampoco concurre el requisito del inter\u00e9s p\u00fablico previsto en el Real Decreto 1690\/1986.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">El Tribunal Supremo rechaza todos los motivos dirigidos por la recurrente contra la sentencia. No aprecia incongruencia o falta de motivaci\u00f3n, indefensi\u00f3n o err\u00f3nea interpretaci\u00f3n de las normas sobre revisi\u00f3n de los actos administrativos. Tambi\u00e9n rechaza la concurrencia del requisito de inter\u00e9s p\u00fablico, en orden a su doctrina del \u201c<em>efecto \u00fatil del recurso<\/em>\u201d de casaci\u00f3n porque, aunque fuera estimado en este punto, el sentido del fallo no sufrir\u00eda modificaci\u00f3n alguna.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">En definitiva, se desestima el recurso de casaci\u00f3n de la Comisi\u00f3n Promotora y se confirma la sentencia de instancia.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.poderjudicial.es\/search\/indexAN.jsp\">Texto completo en CENDOJ<\/a> (Roj: STS 500\/2019 &#8211; ECLI: ES:TS:2019:500).<\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row type=&#8221;in_container&#8221; full_screen_row_position=&#8221;middle&#8221; scene_position=&#8221;center&#8221; text_color=&#8221;dark&#8221; text_align=&#8221;left&#8221; overlay_strength=&#8221;0.3&#8243; shape_divider_position=&#8221;bottom&#8221;][vc_column column_padding=&#8221;no-extra-padding&#8221; column_padding_position=&#8221;all&#8221; background_color_opacity=&#8221;1&#8243; background_hover_color_opacity=&#8221;1&#8243; column_shadow=&#8221;none&#8221; column_border_radius=&#8221;none&#8221; width=&#8221;1\/1&#8243; tablet_text_alignment=&#8221;default&#8221; phone_text_alignment=&#8221;default&#8221; column_border_width=&#8221;none&#8221; column_border_style=&#8221;solid&#8221;][vc_column_text] STS 217\/2019.\u00a0Se confirma la improcedencia de que el barrio de Igueldo&hellip; <a class=\"continue\" href=\"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/ts-segregacion-municipal-2\/\">Seguir Leyendo<span> TS &#8211; Segregaci\u00f3n municipal<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[105],"tags":[203,163],"class_list":["post-3613","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-jurisprudencia","tag-segregacion-municipal","tag-tribunal-supremo"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3613","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3613"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3613\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3614,"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3613\/revisions\/3614"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3613"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3613"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3613"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}