{"id":7239,"date":"2022-02-17T12:00:47","date_gmt":"2022-02-17T11:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/?p=7239"},"modified":"2022-02-17T00:09:44","modified_gmt":"2022-02-16T23:09:44","slug":"ts-administracion-electoral","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/ts-administracion-electoral\/","title":{"rendered":"TS \u2013 Administraci\u00f3n electoral"},"content":{"rendered":"[vc_row type=&#8221;in_container&#8221; full_screen_row_position=&#8221;middle&#8221; column_margin=&#8221;default&#8221; column_direction=&#8221;default&#8221; column_direction_tablet=&#8221;default&#8221; column_direction_phone=&#8221;default&#8221; scene_position=&#8221;center&#8221; text_color=&#8221;dark&#8221; text_align=&#8221;left&#8221; row_border_radius=&#8221;none&#8221; row_border_radius_applies=&#8221;bg&#8221; overflow=&#8221;visible&#8221; overlay_strength=&#8221;0.3&#8243; gradient_direction=&#8221;left_to_right&#8221; shape_divider_position=&#8221;bottom&#8221; bg_image_animation=&#8221;none&#8221;][vc_column column_padding=&#8221;no-extra-padding&#8221; column_padding_tablet=&#8221;inherit&#8221; column_padding_phone=&#8221;inherit&#8221; column_padding_position=&#8221;all&#8221; column_element_spacing=&#8221;default&#8221; background_color_opacity=&#8221;1&#8243; background_hover_color_opacity=&#8221;1&#8243; column_shadow=&#8221;none&#8221; column_border_radius=&#8221;none&#8221; column_link_target=&#8221;_self&#8221; column_position=&#8221;default&#8221; gradient_direction=&#8221;left_to_right&#8221; overlay_strength=&#8221;0.3&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/1&#8243; tablet_width_inherit=&#8221;default&#8221; tablet_text_alignment=&#8221;default&#8221; phone_text_alignment=&#8221;default&#8221; animation_type=&#8221;default&#8221; bg_image_animation=&#8221;none&#8221; border_type=&#8221;simple&#8221; column_border_width=&#8221;none&#8221; column_border_style=&#8221;solid&#8221;][vc_column_text]\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>STS 491\/2021. <\/strong>La existencia de una sentencia condenatoria conlleva la p\u00e9rdida de condici\u00f3n de concejal de un Ayuntamiento por incurrir en una causa de incompatibilidad para desempe\u00f1ar el cargo. Sin embargo, si por una causa posterior se revoca la sentencia, se invalida la incompatibilidad.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row type=&#8221;in_container&#8221; full_screen_row_position=&#8221;middle&#8221; column_margin=&#8221;default&#8221; column_direction=&#8221;default&#8221; column_direction_tablet=&#8221;default&#8221; column_direction_phone=&#8221;default&#8221; scene_position=&#8221;center&#8221; text_color=&#8221;dark&#8221; text_align=&#8221;left&#8221; row_border_radius=&#8221;none&#8221; row_border_radius_applies=&#8221;bg&#8221; overflow=&#8221;visible&#8221; overlay_strength=&#8221;0.3&#8243; gradient_direction=&#8221;left_to_right&#8221; shape_divider_position=&#8221;bottom&#8221; bg_image_animation=&#8221;none&#8221;][vc_column column_padding=&#8221;no-extra-padding&#8221; column_padding_tablet=&#8221;inherit&#8221; column_padding_phone=&#8221;inherit&#8221; column_padding_position=&#8221;all&#8221; column_element_spacing=&#8221;default&#8221; background_color_opacity=&#8221;1&#8243; background_hover_color_opacity=&#8221;1&#8243; column_shadow=&#8221;none&#8221; column_border_radius=&#8221;none&#8221; column_link_target=&#8221;_self&#8221; column_position=&#8221;default&#8221; gradient_direction=&#8221;left_to_right&#8221; overlay_strength=&#8221;0.3&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/1&#8243; tablet_width_inherit=&#8221;default&#8221; tablet_text_alignment=&#8221;default&#8221; phone_text_alignment=&#8221;default&#8221; animation_type=&#8221;default&#8221; bg_image_animation=&#8221;none&#8221; border_type=&#8221;simple&#8221; column_border_width=&#8221;none&#8221; column_border_style=&#8221;solid&#8221;][vc_column_text]\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>STS 491\/2021 de 9 de abril. <\/strong>Se interpone recurso contencioso-administrativo contra la resoluci\u00f3n de la Junta electoral Central por la que se exped\u00eda la credencial de concejal del Ayuntamiento de Canet d\u00b4en Berenguer (Valencia) a favor del recurrente.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">La cuesti\u00f3n principal se centra en dilucidar si la existencia de una sentencia condenatoria conlleva <em>ex lege<\/em> la p\u00e9rdida de condici\u00f3n de concejal del recurrente.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">El TS estudia la normativa aplicable al caso y concluye rotundamente que la p\u00e9rdida de la condici\u00f3n de concejal, en este caso, se produjo como consecuencia de una sentencia condenatoria dictada en el proceso penal, y no de la actuaci\u00f3n de la Junta Electoral Central. Esto significa que la sentencia penal condenatoria por un delito contra la Administraci\u00f3n P\u00fablica, tipificado en el art\u00edculo 405 CP, implica, por imperativo legal, que el condenado por esa sentencia incurra en una causa de inelegibilidad en los t\u00e9rminos del art\u00edculo 6.2 b) LOREG. Al mismo tiempo constituye una causa de incompatibilidad tal y como establece el art\u00edculo 69.4 LOREG. Por lo tanto, el Alto Tribunal dispone que esa causa de incompatibilidad debe conducir a la p\u00e9rdida de la condici\u00f3n de concejal en el momento en el que el Ayuntamiento conoce de la existencia de una sentencia condenatoria. Por ende, con base en la normativa electoral general, una sentencia condenatoria penal constituye un hecho determinante del efecto <em>ex lege<\/em> de la p\u00e9rdida de condici\u00f3n de concejal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Sin embargo, debe tenerse en cuenta que en este caso concreto la sentencia condenatoria fue revocada en apelaci\u00f3n por la Audiencia Provincial de Valencia absolviendo del delito contra la Administraci\u00f3n P\u00fablica al concejal en cuesti\u00f3n.\u00a0 Por lo tanto,\u00a0 a juicio del Tribunal Supremo, al tratarse de una causa posterior, dicha revocaci\u00f3n de la sentencia debe conllevar autom\u00e1ticamente a invalidar la causa de incompatibilidad que extingu\u00eda la condici\u00f3n de concejal.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">En consecuencia, el TS estima el recurso contencioso-administrativo interpuesto contra la resoluci\u00f3n de la Junta Electoral Central por la que se exped\u00eda la credencial de concejal de Ayuntamiento y anula el acuerdo y la certificaci\u00f3n expedida.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.poderjudicial.es\/search\/indexAN.jsp\">Texto completo en CENDOJ (Roj: STS 1259\/2021 &#8211; ECLI:ES:TS:2021:1259).<\/a><\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row type=&#8221;in_container&#8221; full_screen_row_position=&#8221;middle&#8221; column_margin=&#8221;default&#8221; column_direction=&#8221;default&#8221; column_direction_tablet=&#8221;default&#8221; column_direction_phone=&#8221;default&#8221; scene_position=&#8221;center&#8221; text_color=&#8221;dark&#8221; text_align=&#8221;left&#8221; row_border_radius=&#8221;none&#8221; row_border_radius_applies=&#8221;bg&#8221; overflow=&#8221;visible&#8221; overlay_strength=&#8221;0.3&#8243; gradient_direction=&#8221;left_to_right&#8221; shape_divider_position=&#8221;bottom&#8221; bg_image_animation=&#8221;none&#8221;][vc_column column_padding=&#8221;no-extra-padding&#8221; column_padding_tablet=&#8221;inherit&#8221; column_padding_phone=&#8221;inherit&#8221; column_padding_position=&#8221;all&#8221; column_element_spacing=&#8221;default&#8221; background_color_opacity=&#8221;1&#8243; background_hover_color_opacity=&#8221;1&#8243; column_shadow=&#8221;none&#8221; column_border_radius=&#8221;none&#8221; column_link_target=&#8221;_self&#8221; column_position=&#8221;default&#8221; gradient_direction=&#8221;left_to_right&#8221; overlay_strength=&#8221;0.3&#8243;&hellip; <a class=\"continue\" href=\"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/ts-administracion-electoral\/\">Seguir Leyendo<span> TS \u2013 Administraci\u00f3n electoral<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":51,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[105],"tags":[205,163],"class_list":["post-7239","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-jurisprudencia","tag-loreg","tag-tribunal-supremo"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7239","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/51"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7239"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7239\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7299,"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7239\/revisions\/7299"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7239"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7239"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7239"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}