{"id":7994,"date":"2022-06-28T12:00:41","date_gmt":"2022-06-28T10:00:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/?p=7994"},"modified":"2022-06-27T21:36:23","modified_gmt":"2022-06-27T19:36:23","slug":"ts-seguridad-social-3","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/ts-seguridad-social-3\/","title":{"rendered":"TS \u2013 Seguridad Social"},"content":{"rendered":"[vc_row type=&#8221;in_container&#8221; full_screen_row_position=&#8221;middle&#8221; column_margin=&#8221;default&#8221; column_direction=&#8221;default&#8221; column_direction_tablet=&#8221;default&#8221; column_direction_phone=&#8221;default&#8221; scene_position=&#8221;center&#8221; text_color=&#8221;dark&#8221; text_align=&#8221;left&#8221; row_border_radius=&#8221;none&#8221; row_border_radius_applies=&#8221;bg&#8221; overflow=&#8221;visible&#8221; overlay_strength=&#8221;0.3&#8243; gradient_direction=&#8221;left_to_right&#8221; shape_divider_position=&#8221;bottom&#8221; bg_image_animation=&#8221;none&#8221;][vc_column column_padding=&#8221;no-extra-padding&#8221; column_padding_tablet=&#8221;inherit&#8221; column_padding_phone=&#8221;inherit&#8221; column_padding_position=&#8221;all&#8221; column_element_spacing=&#8221;default&#8221; background_color_opacity=&#8221;1&#8243; background_hover_color_opacity=&#8221;1&#8243; column_shadow=&#8221;none&#8221; column_border_radius=&#8221;none&#8221; column_link_target=&#8221;_self&#8221; column_position=&#8221;default&#8221; gradient_direction=&#8221;left_to_right&#8221; overlay_strength=&#8221;0.3&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/1&#8243; tablet_width_inherit=&#8221;default&#8221; tablet_text_alignment=&#8221;default&#8221; phone_text_alignment=&#8221;default&#8221; animation_type=&#8221;default&#8221; bg_image_animation=&#8221;none&#8221; border_type=&#8221;simple&#8221; column_border_width=&#8221;none&#8221; column_border_style=&#8221;solid&#8221;][vc_column_text]\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>STS 668\/2021. <\/strong>La Administraci\u00f3n P\u00fablica concedente deber\u00e1 responder solidariamente de los incumplimientos de la empresa concesionaria respecto del pago de cotizaciones.<\/p>\n<p><!--more-->[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row][vc_row type=&#8221;in_container&#8221; full_screen_row_position=&#8221;middle&#8221; column_margin=&#8221;default&#8221; column_direction=&#8221;default&#8221; column_direction_tablet=&#8221;default&#8221; column_direction_phone=&#8221;default&#8221; scene_position=&#8221;center&#8221; text_color=&#8221;dark&#8221; text_align=&#8221;left&#8221; row_border_radius=&#8221;none&#8221; row_border_radius_applies=&#8221;bg&#8221; overflow=&#8221;visible&#8221; overlay_strength=&#8221;0.3&#8243; gradient_direction=&#8221;left_to_right&#8221; shape_divider_position=&#8221;bottom&#8221; bg_image_animation=&#8221;none&#8221;][vc_column column_padding=&#8221;no-extra-padding&#8221; column_padding_tablet=&#8221;inherit&#8221; column_padding_phone=&#8221;inherit&#8221; column_padding_position=&#8221;all&#8221; column_element_spacing=&#8221;default&#8221; background_color_opacity=&#8221;1&#8243; background_hover_color_opacity=&#8221;1&#8243; column_shadow=&#8221;none&#8221; column_border_radius=&#8221;none&#8221; column_link_target=&#8221;_self&#8221; column_position=&#8221;default&#8221; gradient_direction=&#8221;left_to_right&#8221; overlay_strength=&#8221;0.3&#8243; width=&#8221;1\/1&#8243; tablet_width_inherit=&#8221;default&#8221; tablet_text_alignment=&#8221;default&#8221; phone_text_alignment=&#8221;default&#8221; animation_type=&#8221;default&#8221; bg_image_animation=&#8221;none&#8221; border_type=&#8221;simple&#8221; column_border_width=&#8221;none&#8221; column_border_style=&#8221;solid&#8221;][vc_column_text]\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>STS 668\/2021 de 12 de mayo. <\/strong>Se interpone recurso de casaci\u00f3n por el Ayuntamiento de Benidorm contra la sentencia dictada por el TSJ de la Comunidad Valenciana frente a la Resoluci\u00f3n de la Direcci\u00f3n Provincial de la Tesorer\u00eda General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) en Alicante en virtud de la cual se acordaba no aceptar el requerimiento previo al recurso contencioso-administrativo y confirmaba la resoluci\u00f3n declarativa de responsabilidad solidaria de la deuda contra\u00edda con la TGSS de una sociedad mercantil concesionaria del Ayuntamiento.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">La cuesti\u00f3n principal se centra en dilucidar si, en el marco de una concesi\u00f3n administrativa, la Administraci\u00f3n concedente responde de forma solidaria de aquellos incumplimientos que la empresa concesionaria haya incurrido en materia de Seguridad Social, concretamente en relaci\u00f3n con los ingresos de las cotizaciones sociales.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">En este sentido, el TS dispone que lo primero que debe tenerse en cuenta es que la normativa de contrataci\u00f3n p\u00fablica no otorga una soluci\u00f3n a la cuesti\u00f3n que se pretende resolver en este caso. Ello conlleva que, aunque si bien es cierto que la normativa contractual podr\u00eda haber previsto una exorbitancia en favor de la Administraci\u00f3n para resolver esta cuesti\u00f3n, el legislador no lo ha hecho as\u00ed. Ello no conlleva que exista un vac\u00edo normativo, pues debe recurrirse a la normativa general de aplicaci\u00f3n, concretamente a la LGSS y al ET, ya que en este caso se contempla tanto la situaci\u00f3n de los empleados de la contratista como los cr\u00e9ditos de la TGSS. Por lo tanto, queda en un segundo plano cu\u00e1l es la relaci\u00f3n concreta entre la contratista y el empresario principal, que en este caso es una Administraci\u00f3n.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">De los art\u00edculos 93.1 LJCA, 42.1 ET, 142 y 168.1 y 2 LGSS se infiere que cuando la Administraci\u00f3n P\u00fablica es quien contrata la gesti\u00f3n de un servicio p\u00fablico con una empresa, responde solidariamente por los incumplimientos de la concesionaria respecto del pago de cotizaciones a la Seguridad Social.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">En consecuencia, el TS desestima el recurso de casaci\u00f3n contra la sentencia del TSJ de la Comunidad Valenciana que confirm\u00f3 la Resoluci\u00f3n de la TGSS en virtud de la cual se declaraba responsable solidario al Ayuntamiento de Benidorm de la deuda contra\u00edda con la Seguridad Social por una empresa concesionaria del Ayuntamiento.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.poderjudicial.es\/search\/indexAN.jsp\">Texto completo en CENDOJ (Roj: STS 1817\/2021 &#8211; ECLI:ES:TS:2021:1817).<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n[\/vc_column_text][\/vc_column][\/vc_row]\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[vc_row type=&#8221;in_container&#8221; full_screen_row_position=&#8221;middle&#8221; column_margin=&#8221;default&#8221; column_direction=&#8221;default&#8221; column_direction_tablet=&#8221;default&#8221; column_direction_phone=&#8221;default&#8221; scene_position=&#8221;center&#8221; text_color=&#8221;dark&#8221; text_align=&#8221;left&#8221; row_border_radius=&#8221;none&#8221; row_border_radius_applies=&#8221;bg&#8221; overflow=&#8221;visible&#8221; overlay_strength=&#8221;0.3&#8243; gradient_direction=&#8221;left_to_right&#8221; shape_divider_position=&#8221;bottom&#8221; bg_image_animation=&#8221;none&#8221;][vc_column column_padding=&#8221;no-extra-padding&#8221; column_padding_tablet=&#8221;inherit&#8221; column_padding_phone=&#8221;inherit&#8221; column_padding_position=&#8221;all&#8221; column_element_spacing=&#8221;default&#8221; background_color_opacity=&#8221;1&#8243; background_hover_color_opacity=&#8221;1&#8243; column_shadow=&#8221;none&#8221; column_border_radius=&#8221;none&#8221; column_link_target=&#8221;_self&#8221; column_position=&#8221;default&#8221; gradient_direction=&#8221;left_to_right&#8221; overlay_strength=&#8221;0.3&#8243;&hellip; <a class=\"continue\" href=\"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/ts-seguridad-social-3\/\">Seguir Leyendo<span> TS \u2013 Seguridad Social<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":51,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[105],"tags":[163],"class_list":["post-7994","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-jurisprudencia","tag-tribunal-supremo"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7994","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/51"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7994"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7994\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7995,"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7994\/revisions\/7995"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7994"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7994"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.idluam.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7994"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}